Side by sideSuburb comparison

Hillsdale vs Matraville.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Hillsdale edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Hillsdale scores higher on walkability (24/100 vs 10/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Matraville skews owner-occupied (63%), Hillsdale runs more rental-dense (43% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsHillsdale vs Matraville

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Hillsdale or Matraville?

Hillsdale scores 24/100 on walkability vs 10/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Hillsdale
Metric
Matraville

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$520/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$520/wk
$450/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$480/wk
43.0%
Owner occupied
63.0%
55.0%
Renter occupied
35.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

24
Walk score
10
0
Transit score
10
100
Bike score
100
5,647
Population
9,925
35
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1042
Avg ICSEA
1042

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).