Side by sideSuburb comparison

Horn vs New Mapoon.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Horn edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Horn (830) sits above New Mapoon (780). Horn skews owner-occupied (20%), New Mapoon runs more rental-dense (5% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Horn edges out on average school ICSEA (830 vs 780). New Mapoon also has a higher family-household share (77% vs 61%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsHorn vs New Mapoon

Common questions

Does Horn or New Mapoon have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Horn scores 830 vs 780 in New Mapoon. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Horn
Metric
New Mapoon

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$148/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$120/wk
$201/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$125/wk
20.0%
Owner occupied
5.0%
70.0%
Renter occupied
93.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
533
Population
412
28
Median age
25

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
3
830
Avg ICSEA
780

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).