Side by sideSuburb comparison

Hotspur vs Digby.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Hotspur edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Hotspur (968) sits above Digby (962). Digby skews owner-occupied (81%), Hotspur runs more rental-dense (65% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Hotspur edges out on average school ICSEA (968 vs 962). Digby also has a higher family-household share (58% vs 47%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsHotspur vs Digby

Common questions

Does Hotspur or Digby have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Hotspur scores 968 vs 962 in Digby. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Hotspur
Metric
Digby

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$185/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$120/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$120/wk
65.0%
Owner occupied
81.0%
18.0%
Renter occupied
8.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
34
Population
122
53
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
10
968
Avg ICSEA
962

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).