Side by sideSuburb comparison

Howes Valley vs Garland Valley.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Howes Valley edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Howes Valley (888) sits above Garland Valley (885). Garland Valley skews owner-occupied (233%), Howes Valley runs more rental-dense (93% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Howes Valley edges out on average school ICSEA (888 vs 885). Garland Valley also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 66%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsHowes Valley vs Garland Valley

Common questions

Does Howes Valley or Garland Valley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Howes Valley scores 888 vs 885 in Garland Valley. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Howes Valley
Metric
Garland Valley

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$335/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$335/wk
$175/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$285/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
233.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
80
Population
22
51
Median age
62

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
2
888
Avg ICSEA
885

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).