Side by sideSuburb comparison

Hughes vs Livingstone.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Hughes skews owner-occupied (100%), Livingstone runs more rental-dense (76% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Hughes has a heavier family-household mix (100% vs 80%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Hughes
Metric
Livingstone

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$80/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$80/wk
$277/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
73
Population
443
48
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
6
965
Avg ICSEA
965

Climate

1705 mm
Annual rainfall
1705 mm
31.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).