Side by sideSuburb comparison

Humpybong vs Redcliffe.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $381,000 and $785,000.

Humpybong (median $381,000) is roughly 51% cheaper to buy into than Redcliffe ($785,000). Over the past year, Redcliffe (+8.2%) ran 8.2 percentage points ahead of Humpybong (0%) on house-price growth.

Redcliffe scores higher on walkability (6/100 vs 92/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Humpybong (1011) sits above Redcliffe (1003).

Humpybong
Metric
Redcliffe

Price & Market

$381,000
Median house
$785,000
$274,320
Median unit
$569,000
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+8.2%
Days on market
28 days

Rental

$330/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$650/wk
$281/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$500/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

6
Walk score
92
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
20,576
Population
25,603
47
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1011
Avg ICSEA
1003

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Humpybong is the lower entry point at $381,000 median, 51% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Humpybong delivers the better gross yield (4.50% vs 4.31%), but Redcliffe has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Humpybong edges out on average school ICSEA (1011 vs 1003).

Common questionsHumpybong vs Redcliffe

Common questions

Is Humpybong or Redcliffe cheaper to buy in?

Humpybong has the lower median house price at $381,000, roughly 51% below Redcliffe ($785,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Humpybong or Redcliffe?

Over the past 12 months, Redcliffe grew +8.2% vs 0% in Humpybong, a gap of 8.2 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Humpybong or Redcliffe have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Humpybong scores 1011 vs 1003 in Redcliffe. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Humpybong or Redcliffe?

Redcliffe scores 92/100 on walkability vs 6/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Humpybong or Redcliffe?

Gross rental yield on houses is 4.50% in Humpybong vs 4.31% in Redcliffe. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.