Side by sideSuburb comparison

Hunterston vs Mcloughlins Beach.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mcloughlins Beach edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mcloughlins Beach (984) sits above Hunterston (976). Mcloughlins Beach skews owner-occupied (90%), Hunterston runs more rental-dense (33% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mcloughlins Beach edges out on average school ICSEA (984 vs 976). Hunterston also has a higher family-household share (75% vs 46%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsHunterston vs Mcloughlins Beach

Common questions

Does Hunterston or Mcloughlins Beach have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mcloughlins Beach scores 984 vs 976 in Hunterston. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Hunterston
Metric
Mcloughlins Beach

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

Rent (house / wk)
Rent (unit / wk)
33.0%
Owner occupied
90.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
20
Population
121
48
Median age
61

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
2
976
Avg ICSEA
984

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).