Side by sideSuburb comparison

Illawong vs Como.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,915,000 and $1,775,000. Como edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Como (median $1,775,000) is roughly 8% cheaper to buy into than Illawong ($1,915,000). Over the past year, Illawong (+7%) ran 3.9 percentage points ahead of Como (+3.1%) on house-price growth.

Como scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 18/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Como (1088) sits above Illawong (1079).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Como is the lower entry point at $1,775,000 median, 8% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Como delivers the better gross yield (2.93% vs 2.72%), but Illawong has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Como edges out on average school ICSEA (1088 vs 1079).

Common questionsIllawong vs Como

Common questions

Is Illawong or Como cheaper to buy in?

Como has the lower median house price at $1,775,000, roughly 8% below Illawong ($1,915,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Illawong or Como?

Over the past 12 months, Illawong grew +7% vs +3.1% in Como, a gap of 3.9 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Illawong or Como have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Como scores 1088 vs 1079 in Illawong. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Illawong or Como?

Como scores 18/100 on walkability vs 2/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Illawong or Como?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.93% in Como vs 2.72% in Illawong. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Illawong
Metric
Como

Price & Market

$1,915,000
Median house
$1,775,000
$427,680
Median unit
$443,520
+7.0%
Annual growth (house)
+3.1%
Days on market

Rental

$1000/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$1000/wk
$663/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$680/wk
91.0%
Owner occupied
89.0%
8.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
18
0
Transit score
30
100
Bike score
45
7,427
Population
4,053
44
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1079
Avg ICSEA
1088

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).