Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ironbark vs Gundamulda.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ironbark edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ironbark (914) sits above Gundamulda (901). Ironbark skews owner-occupied (120%), Gundamulda runs more rental-dense (43% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ironbark edges out on average school ICSEA (914 vs 901). Gundamulda also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 90%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsIronbark vs Gundamulda

Common questions

Does Ironbark or Gundamulda have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ironbark scores 914 vs 901 in Gundamulda. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Ironbark
Metric
Gundamulda

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$187/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$187/wk
$50/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$100/wk
120.0%
Owner occupied
43.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
22
Population
25
53
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
3
914
Avg ICSEA
901

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).