Side by sideSuburb comparison

Jackadgery vs Heifer Station.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Jackadgery edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Jackadgery (925) sits above Heifer Station (914). Heifer Station skews owner-occupied (100%), Jackadgery runs more rental-dense (65% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Jackadgery edges out on average school ICSEA (925 vs 914). Heifer Station also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 68%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsJackadgery vs Heifer Station

Common questions

Does Jackadgery or Heifer Station have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Jackadgery scores 925 vs 914 in Heifer Station. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Jackadgery
Metric
Heifer Station

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$255/wk
65.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
132
Population
8
45
Median age
59

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
11
925
Avg ICSEA
914

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).