Side by sideSuburb comparison

Jilkminggan vs Beswick Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Jilkminggan edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Jilkminggan (735) sits above Beswick Creek (681). Beswick Creek skews owner-occupied (56%), Jilkminggan runs more rental-dense (14% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Jilkminggan edges out on average school ICSEA (735 vs 681). Jilkminggan also has a higher family-household share (97% vs 33%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsJilkminggan vs Beswick Creek

Common questions

Does Jilkminggan or Beswick Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Jilkminggan scores 735 vs 681 in Beswick Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Jilkminggan
Metric
Beswick Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$80/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$80/wk
$48/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$68/wk
14.0%
Owner occupied
56.0%
83.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
263
Population
16
25
Median age
28

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
3
735
Avg ICSEA
681

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).