Side by sideSuburb comparison

Jingellic vs Wantagong.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Jingellic skews owner-occupied (96%), Wantagong runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

The numbers behind the take

Jingellic
Metric
Wantagong

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$256/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$180/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
96.0%
Owner occupied
60.0%
12.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
73
Population
76
58
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
7
942
Avg ICSEA
942

Climate

585 mm
Annual rainfall
585 mm
31.1°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.1°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).