Side by sideSuburb comparison

Johnsons Hill vs Walterhall.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Johnsons Hill edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Johnsons Hill (876) sits above Walterhall (846). Walterhall skews owner-occupied (79%), Johnsons Hill runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Johnsons Hill edges out on average school ICSEA (876 vs 846). Johnsons Hill also has a higher family-household share (60% vs 47%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsJohnsons Hill vs Walterhall

Common questions

Does Johnsons Hill or Walterhall have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Johnsons Hill scores 876 vs 846 in Walterhall. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Johnsons Hill
Metric
Walterhall

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$170/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
60.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
20
Bike score
15
7
Population
156
35
Median age
54

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
876
Avg ICSEA
846

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).