Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kanni vs Holder.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Holder edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Holder (974) sits above Kanni (971). Holder skews owner-occupied (86%), Kanni runs more rental-dense (55% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Holder edges out on average school ICSEA (974 vs 971). Holder also has a higher family-household share (81% vs 45%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsKanni vs Holder

Common questions

Does Kanni or Holder have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Holder scores 974 vs 971 in Kanni. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kanni
Metric
Holder

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$190/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
55.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
Renter occupied
23.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
36
Population
123
43
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
4
971
Avg ICSEA
974

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).