Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kayuga vs Aberdeen.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Aberdeen edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Aberdeen (929) sits above Kayuga (920). Aberdeen skews owner-occupied (74%), Kayuga runs more rental-dense (29% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Aberdeen edges out on average school ICSEA (929 vs 920).

Common questionsKayuga vs Aberdeen

Common questions

Does Kayuga or Aberdeen have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Aberdeen scores 929 vs 920 in Kayuga. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kayuga
Metric
Aberdeen

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$270/wk
$275/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$280/wk
29.0%
Owner occupied
74.0%
52.0%
Renter occupied
24.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
20
49
Population
2,051
45
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
2
920
Avg ICSEA
929

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).