Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kelvin vs Blue Vale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Blue Vale edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Blue Vale (913) sits above Kelvin (910).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Blue Vale edges out on average school ICSEA (913 vs 910). Blue Vale also has a higher family-household share (95% vs 83%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsKelvin vs Blue Vale

Common questions

Does Kelvin or Blue Vale have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Blue Vale scores 913 vs 910 in Kelvin. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kelvin
Metric
Blue Vale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$220/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$325/wk
75.0%
Owner occupied
81.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied
33.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
182
Population
81
43
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
13
910
Avg ICSEA
913

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).