Side by sideSuburb comparison

Killarney vs Crossley.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $334,000 and $334,000. Killarney edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Killarney and Crossley have near-identical medians ($334,000 vs $334,000).

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Killarney (1015) sits above Crossley (1014).

Killarney
Metric
Crossley

Price & Market

$334,000
Median house
$334,000
$240,480
Median unit
$240,480
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$263/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$263/wk
$224/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$265/wk
Owner occupied
89.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
1,423
Population
235
45
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

18
Schools nearby
19
1015
Avg ICSEA
1014

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

The two suburbs land at similar price points ($334,000 vs $334,000), so the buying decision usually comes down to lifestyle fit rather than affordability.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Killarney edges out on average school ICSEA (1015 vs 1014).

Common questionsKillarney vs Crossley

Common questions

Does Killarney or Crossley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Killarney scores 1015 vs 1014 in Crossley. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.