Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kings Park vs Perth Gpo.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Perth Gpo scores higher on walkability (16/100 vs 100/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kings Park (1135) sits above Perth Gpo (1125).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kings Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1135 vs 1125).

Common questionsKings Park vs Perth Gpo

Common questions

Does Kings Park or Perth Gpo have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kings Park scores 1135 vs 1125 in Perth Gpo. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Kings Park or Perth Gpo?

Perth Gpo scores 100/100 on walkability vs 16/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Kings Park
Metric
Perth Gpo

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$400/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$1000/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$340/wk
38.0%
Owner occupied
31.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

16
Walk score
100
0
Transit score
100
100
Bike score
100
48
Population
13,812
61
Median age
33

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1135
Avg ICSEA
1125

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).