Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kingsgate vs Red Range.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kingsgate edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kingsgate (925) sits above Red Range (923). Kingsgate skews owner-occupied (100%), Red Range runs more rental-dense (77% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kingsgate edges out on average school ICSEA (925 vs 923).

Common questionsKingsgate vs Red Range

Common questions

Does Kingsgate or Red Range have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kingsgate scores 925 vs 923 in Red Range. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kingsgate
Metric
Red Range

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$225/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$225/wk
$191/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
77.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
5
Population
247
23
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
7
925
Avg ICSEA
923

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).