Side by sideSuburb comparison

Koo Wee Rup North vs Monomeith.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Koo Wee Rup North edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Koo Wee Rup North (994) sits above Monomeith (981). Koo Wee Rup North skews owner-occupied (109%), Monomeith runs more rental-dense (81% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Koo Wee Rup North edges out on average school ICSEA (994 vs 981). Koo Wee Rup North also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 54%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsKoo Wee Rup North vs Monomeith

Common questions

Does Koo Wee Rup North or Monomeith have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Koo Wee Rup North scores 994 vs 981 in Monomeith. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Koo Wee Rup North
Metric
Monomeith

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$313/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$42/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
109.0%
Owner occupied
81.0%
27.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
47
Population
69
48
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
5
994
Avg ICSEA
981

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).