Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kooroocheang vs Blampied.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kooroocheang edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kooroocheang (1015) sits above Blampied (1006). Blampied skews owner-occupied (82%), Kooroocheang runs more rental-dense (64% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kooroocheang edges out on average school ICSEA (1015 vs 1006). Kooroocheang also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 69%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsKooroocheang vs Blampied

Common questions

Does Kooroocheang or Blampied have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kooroocheang scores 1015 vs 1006 in Blampied. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kooroocheang
Metric
Blampied

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$207/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$207/wk
$176/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$325/wk
64.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
Renter occupied
7.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
41
Population
237
45
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
5
1015
Avg ICSEA
1006

Climate

612 mm
Annual rainfall
612 mm
23.2°C
Mean max (Jan)
23.2°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).