Side by sideSuburb comparison

Kotupna vs St Germains.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kotupna edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kotupna (974) sits above St Germains (971). Kotupna skews owner-occupied (87%), St Germains runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kotupna edges out on average school ICSEA (974 vs 971). St Germains also has a higher family-household share (86% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsKotupna vs St Germains

Common questions

Does Kotupna or St Germains have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kotupna scores 974 vs 971 in St Germains. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Kotupna
Metric
St Germains

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$194/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$83/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$225/wk
87.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
132
Population
75
46
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
10
974
Avg ICSEA
971

Climate

422 mm
Annual rainfall
422 mm
29.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
29.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).