Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lagoon Grass vs Lismore Heights.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lagoon Grass edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lagoon Grass (977) sits above Lismore Heights (974). Lagoon Grass skews owner-occupied (82%), Lismore Heights runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lagoon Grass edges out on average school ICSEA (977 vs 974). Lagoon Grass also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 60%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsLagoon Grass vs Lismore Heights

Common questions

Does Lagoon Grass or Lismore Heights have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lagoon Grass scores 977 vs 974 in Lismore Heights. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Lagoon Grass
Metric
Lismore Heights

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$310/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$310/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$338/wk
82.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
Renter occupied
31.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
100
49
Population
2,117
39
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
977
Avg ICSEA
974

Climate

1304 mm
Annual rainfall
1304 mm
28.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
28.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).