Side by sideSuburb comparison

Laguna Quays vs Bloomsbury.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Laguna Quays edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Laguna Quays (973) sits above Bloomsbury (964). Bloomsbury skews owner-occupied (82%), Laguna Quays runs more rental-dense (53% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Laguna Quays edges out on average school ICSEA (973 vs 964). Bloomsbury also has a higher family-household share (71% vs 33%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsLaguna Quays vs Bloomsbury

Common questions

Does Laguna Quays or Bloomsbury have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Laguna Quays scores 973 vs 964 in Bloomsbury. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Laguna Quays
Metric
Bloomsbury

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$210/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$214/wk
53.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
49.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
89
Population
539
53
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
6
973
Avg ICSEA
964

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).