Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lake Biddy vs Newdegate.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Newdegate edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Newdegate scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 32/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Lake Biddy skews owner-occupied (87%), Newdegate runs more rental-dense (62% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Newdegate has a heavier family-household mix (56% vs 43%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsLake Biddy vs Newdegate

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Lake Biddy or Newdegate?

Newdegate scores 32/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Lake Biddy
Metric
Newdegate

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
87.0%
Owner occupied
62.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
32
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
59
Population
159
44
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
1
967
Avg ICSEA
967

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).