Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lake Camm vs Varley.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Lake Camm skews owner-occupied (75%), Varley runs more rental-dense (53% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lake Camm has a heavier family-household mix (138% vs 76%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Lake Camm
Metric
Varley

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$170/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$151/wk
75.0%
Owner occupied
53.0%
Renter occupied
18.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
23
Population
44
41
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
1
986
Avg ICSEA
986

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).