Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lake Mundi vs Heath Field.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Heath Field edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Heath Field (969) sits above Lake Mundi (962).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Heath Field edges out on average school ICSEA (969 vs 962).

Common questionsLake Mundi vs Heath Field

Common questions

Does Lake Mundi or Heath Field have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Heath Field scores 969 vs 962 in Lake Mundi. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Lake Mundi
Metric
Heath Field

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$120/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$160/wk
$180/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$136/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
37
Population
1,707
54
Median age
58

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
10
962
Avg ICSEA
969

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).