Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lamington vs West Lamington.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lamington edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Lamington scores higher on walkability (6/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Lamington skews owner-occupied (68%), West Lamington runs more rental-dense (58% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsLamington vs West Lamington

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Lamington or West Lamington?

Lamington scores 6/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Lamington
Metric
West Lamington

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$310/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$310/wk
$370/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
68.0%
Owner occupied
58.0%
29.0%
Renter occupied
36.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

6
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
80
Bike score
85
2,036
Population
1,373
33
Median age
34

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
16
937
Avg ICSEA
937

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).