Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lange vs Yakamia.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Yakamia edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Yakamia scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 10/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Lange skews owner-occupied (67%), Yakamia runs more rental-dense (57% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsLange vs Yakamia

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Lange or Yakamia?

Yakamia scores 10/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Lange
Metric
Yakamia

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$330/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$320/wk
67.0%
Owner occupied
57.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied
33.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
10
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
35
394
Population
3,025
52
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
16
994
Avg ICSEA
994

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).