Side by sideSuburb comparison

Leichardt vs Campbells Forest.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Leichardt edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Leichardt (973) sits above Campbells Forest (961). Campbells Forest skews owner-occupied (105%), Leichardt runs more rental-dense (84% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Leichardt edges out on average school ICSEA (973 vs 961). Campbells Forest also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 80%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsLeichardt vs Campbells Forest

Common questions

Does Leichardt or Campbells Forest have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Leichardt scores 973 vs 961 in Campbells Forest. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Leichardt
Metric
Campbells Forest

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$208/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$280/wk
$215/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
84.0%
Owner occupied
105.0%
8.0%
Renter occupied
21.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
167
Population
50
38
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
10
973
Avg ICSEA
961

Climate

422 mm
Annual rainfall
422 mm
29.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
29.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).