Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lime Lake vs Cartmeticup.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lime Lake edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lime Lake (934) sits above Cartmeticup (931). Cartmeticup skews owner-occupied (74%), Lime Lake runs more rental-dense (43% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lime Lake edges out on average school ICSEA (934 vs 931). Cartmeticup also has a higher family-household share (105% vs 43%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsLime Lake vs Cartmeticup

Common questions

Does Lime Lake or Cartmeticup have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lime Lake scores 934 vs 931 in Cartmeticup. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Lime Lake
Metric
Cartmeticup

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$180/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$150/wk
$153/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
43.0%
Owner occupied
74.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
16
Population
57
46
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
7
934
Avg ICSEA
931

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).