Little Mulgrave vs Mount Peter
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Peter (907) sits above Little Mulgrave (886). Little Mulgrave skews owner-occupied (94%), Mount Peter runs more rental-dense (83% owner).
Buying in Little Mulgrave or Mount Peter?
Selling in Little Mulgrave? The free selling guide
Little Mulgrave and Mount Peter side by side
| Measure | Little Mulgrave | Mount Peter |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 94.0% | 83.0% |
| Renter occupied | 8.0% | 16.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 5 | 12 |
| Average ICSEA | 886 | 907 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 269 | 689 |
| Median age | 52 | 30 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 1943 mm | 1996 mm |
| Mean max, January | 30.9°C | 31.7°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Mount Peter edges out on average school ICSEA (907 vs 886).
Little Mulgrave vs Mount Peter: common questions
Does Little Mulgrave or Mount Peter have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Peter scores 907 vs 886 in Little Mulgrave. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Little Mulgrave with
Choosing between Little Mulgrave and Mount Peter?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.