Long Pocket vs St Lucia.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. St Lucia edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
St Lucia scores higher on walkability (16/100 vs 78/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving St Lucia (1134) sits above Long Pocket (1129). Long Pocket skews owner-occupied (87%), St Lucia runs more rental-dense (44% owner).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
St Lucia edges out on average school ICSEA (1134 vs 1129). Long Pocket also has a higher family-household share (78% vs 55%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Common questions
Does Long Pocket or St Lucia have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), St Lucia scores 1134 vs 1129 in Long Pocket. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Long Pocket or St Lucia?
St Lucia scores 78/100 on walkability vs 16/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Long Pocket against another suburb