Side by sideSuburb comparison

Longford vs Guthridge.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Guthridge scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 36/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Longford (986) sits above Guthridge (980).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Longford edges out on average school ICSEA (986 vs 980).

Common questionsLongford vs Guthridge

Common questions

Does Longford or Guthridge have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Longford scores 986 vs 980 in Guthridge. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Longford or Guthridge?

Guthridge scores 36/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Longford
Metric
Guthridge

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$205/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$280/wk
$174/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$238/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
36
0
Transit score
10
0
Bike score
60
6,231
Population
15,472
47
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
13
986
Avg ICSEA
980

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).