Side by sideSuburb comparison

Loongana vs Loyetea.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Loongana edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Loongana (931) sits above Loyetea (923). Loongana skews owner-occupied (100%), Loyetea runs more rental-dense (62% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Loongana edges out on average school ICSEA (931 vs 923). Loongana also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 23%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsLoongana vs Loyetea

Common questions

Does Loongana or Loyetea have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Loongana scores 931 vs 923 in Loyetea. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Loongana
Metric
Loyetea

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$246/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$209/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$120/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
62.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
16
Population
20
63
Median age
57

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
931
Avg ICSEA
923

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).