Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lorquon vs Tarranyurk.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lorquon edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lorquon (969) sits above Tarranyurk (967). Lorquon skews owner-occupied (100%), Tarranyurk runs more rental-dense (57% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lorquon edges out on average school ICSEA (969 vs 967).

Common questionsLorquon vs Tarranyurk

Common questions

Does Lorquon or Tarranyurk have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lorquon scores 969 vs 967 in Tarranyurk. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Lorquon
Metric
Tarranyurk

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$198/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$165/wk
$168/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$135/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
57.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
8
Population
36
70
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
11
969
Avg ICSEA
967

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).