Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lowood vs Glamorgan Vale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Glamorgan Vale edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Glamorgan Vale (956) sits above Lowood (940). Glamorgan Vale skews owner-occupied (86%), Lowood runs more rental-dense (62% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Glamorgan Vale edges out on average school ICSEA (956 vs 940).

Common questionsLowood vs Glamorgan Vale

Common questions

Does Lowood or Glamorgan Vale have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Glamorgan Vale scores 956 vs 940 in Lowood. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Lowood
Metric
Glamorgan Vale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$550/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$370/wk
$295/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
62.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
36.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
85
Bike score
4,082
Population
384
40
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
10
940
Avg ICSEA
956

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).