Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lucas vs Cardigan.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lucas edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lucas (1020) sits above Cardigan (1011). Cardigan skews owner-occupied (91%), Lucas runs more rental-dense (64% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lucas edges out on average school ICSEA (1020 vs 1011). Cardigan also has a higher family-household share (90% vs 75%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsLucas vs Cardigan

Common questions

Does Lucas or Cardigan have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lucas scores 1020 vs 1011 in Cardigan. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Lucas
Metric
Cardigan

Price & Market

$625,000
Median house
$240,480
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$322/wk
$380/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
64.0%
Owner occupied
91.0%
34.0%
Renter occupied
7.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
45
2,994
Population
1,064
32
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1020
Avg ICSEA
1011

Climate

612 mm
Annual rainfall
612 mm
23.2°C
Mean max (Jan)
23.2°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).