Side by sideSuburb comparison

Luddenham vs Bringelly.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bringelly edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bringelly (1027) sits above Luddenham (1003).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bringelly edges out on average school ICSEA (1027 vs 1003).

Common questionsLuddenham vs Bringelly

Common questions

Does Luddenham or Bringelly have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bringelly scores 1027 vs 1003 in Luddenham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Luddenham
Metric
Bringelly

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$480/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$500/wk
$480/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$500/wk
83.0%
Owner occupied
74.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied
21.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
1,927
Population
2,433
37
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
20
1003
Avg ICSEA
1027

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).