Side by sideSuburb comparison

Lumholtz vs Bilyana.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bilyana edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bilyana (898) sits above Lumholtz (881).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bilyana edges out on average school ICSEA (898 vs 881).

Common questionsLumholtz vs Bilyana

Common questions

Does Lumholtz or Bilyana have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bilyana scores 898 vs 881 in Lumholtz. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Lumholtz
Metric
Bilyana

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$252/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$214/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
Owner occupied
75.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,368
Population
190
60
Median age
54

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
13
881
Avg ICSEA
898

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).