Side by sideSuburb comparison

Macleod vs North Plantations.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. North Plantations edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

North Plantations scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 4/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Macleod skews owner-occupied (100%), North Plantations runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsMacleod vs North Plantations

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Macleod or North Plantations?

North Plantations scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Macleod
Metric
North Plantations

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$209/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$209/wk
$178/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
59.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
4
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
19
Population
377
19
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

0
Schools nearby
4
Avg ICSEA
934

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).