Side by sideSuburb comparison

Maddingley vs Pentland Hills.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Pentland Hills edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pentland Hills (1018) sits above Maddingley (1015). Pentland Hills skews owner-occupied (84%), Maddingley runs more rental-dense (73% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Pentland Hills edges out on average school ICSEA (1018 vs 1015). Pentland Hills also has a higher family-household share (88% vs 77%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMaddingley vs Pentland Hills

Common questions

Does Maddingley or Pentland Hills have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pentland Hills scores 1018 vs 1015 in Maddingley. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Maddingley
Metric
Pentland Hills

Price & Market

$650,000
Median house
$274,320
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$340/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$360/wk
$366/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
73.0%
Owner occupied
84.0%
24.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
0
5,491
Population
158
33
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
7
1015
Avg ICSEA
1018

Climate

612 mm
Annual rainfall
612 mm
25.3°C
Mean max (Jan)
23.2°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).