Side by sideSuburb comparison

Maffra West Upper vs Tinamba West.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Maffra West Upper edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Maffra West Upper (973) sits above Tinamba West (968). Maffra West Upper skews owner-occupied (100%), Tinamba West runs more rental-dense (48% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Maffra West Upper edges out on average school ICSEA (973 vs 968). Maffra West Upper also has a higher family-household share (104% vs 86%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMaffra West Upper vs Tinamba West

Common questions

Does Maffra West Upper or Tinamba West have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Maffra West Upper scores 973 vs 968 in Tinamba West. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Maffra West Upper
Metric
Tinamba West

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$390/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
48.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
73
Population
63
49
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
9
973
Avg ICSEA
968

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).