Side by sideSuburb comparison

Maitland vs Mount Dee.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Maitland edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Maitland scores higher on walkability (54/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Mount Dee skews owner-occupied (67%), Maitland runs more rental-dense (56% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Dee has a heavier family-household mix (100% vs 59%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsMaitland vs Mount Dee

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Maitland or Mount Dee?

Maitland scores 54/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Maitland
Metric
Mount Dee

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$373/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$373/wk
$320/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$317/wk
56.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
41.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

54
Walk score
0
90
Transit score
0
60
Bike score
100
1,972
Population
14
43
Median age
60

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
990
Avg ICSEA
990

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).