Side by sideSuburb comparison

Manchester Square vs Moss Vale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Moss Vale edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Moss Vale (1053) sits above Manchester Square (1033). Manchester Square skews owner-occupied (83%), Moss Vale runs more rental-dense (70% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Moss Vale edges out on average school ICSEA (1053 vs 1033). Moss Vale also has a higher family-household share (69% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsManchester Square vs Moss Vale

Common questions

Does Manchester Square or Moss Vale have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Moss Vale scores 1053 vs 1033 in Manchester Square. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Manchester Square
Metric
Moss Vale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$400/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$340/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
83.0%
Owner occupied
70.0%
Renter occupied
27.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
55
27
Population
9,310
66
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
14
1033
Avg ICSEA
1053

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).