Side by sideSuburb comparison

Marden vs Royston Park.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,676,338 and $1,660,500. Royston Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Royston Park (median $1,660,500) is roughly 1% cheaper to buy into than Marden ($1,676,338). Over the past year, Marden (+15.6%) ran 40.5 percentage points ahead of Royston Park (-24.9%) on house-price growth.

Royston Park scores higher on walkability (20/100 vs 26/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Royston Park (1107) sits above Marden (1103). Royston Park skews owner-occupied (76%), Marden runs more rental-dense (53% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Royston Park is the lower entry point at $1,660,500 median, 1% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Royston Park delivers the better gross yield (2.20% vs 2.09%), but Marden has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Royston Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1107 vs 1103). Royston Park also has a higher family-household share (71% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMarden vs Royston Park

Common questions

Is Marden or Royston Park cheaper to buy in?

Royston Park has the lower median house price at $1,660,500, roughly 1% below Marden ($1,676,338). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Marden or Royston Park?

Over the past 12 months, Marden grew +15.6% vs -24.9% in Royston Park, a gap of 40.5 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Marden or Royston Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Royston Park scores 1107 vs 1103 in Marden. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Marden or Royston Park?

Royston Park scores 26/100 on walkability vs 20/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Marden or Royston Park?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.20% in Royston Park vs 2.09% in Marden. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Marden
Metric
Royston Park

Price & Market

$1,676,338
Median house
$1,660,500
$289,440
Median unit
$289,440
+15.6%
Annual growth (house)
-24.9%
Days on market

Rental

$675/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$702/wk
$480/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$510/wk
53.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
42.0%
Renter occupied
20.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

20
Walk score
26
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
2,645
Population
1,246
36
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1103
Avg ICSEA
1107

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).