Side by sideSuburb comparison

Marinna vs Landervale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Landervale edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Landervale scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 34/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Landervale has a heavier family-household mix (100% vs 71%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsMarinna vs Landervale

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Marinna or Landervale?

Landervale scores 34/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Marinna
Metric
Landervale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$221/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$221/wk
59.0%
Owner occupied
60.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
34
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
100
36
Population
25
52
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
4
932
Avg ICSEA
932

Climate

585 mm
Annual rainfall
585 mm
31.1°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.1°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).