Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mayrung vs Myrtle Park.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Myrtle Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Myrtle Park (962) sits above Mayrung (956). Myrtle Park skews owner-occupied (94%), Mayrung runs more rental-dense (74% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Myrtle Park edges out on average school ICSEA (962 vs 956). Myrtle Park also has a higher family-household share (88% vs 74%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMayrung vs Myrtle Park

Common questions

Does Mayrung or Myrtle Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Myrtle Park scores 962 vs 956 in Mayrung. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mayrung
Metric
Myrtle Park

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$168/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$80/wk
74.0%
Owner occupied
94.0%
34.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
171
Population
51
34
Median age
33

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
5
956
Avg ICSEA
962

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).