Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mccullys Gap vs Kayuga.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kayuga edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kayuga (920) sits above Mccullys Gap (918). Mccullys Gap skews owner-occupied (74%), Kayuga runs more rental-dense (29% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kayuga edges out on average school ICSEA (920 vs 918). Mccullys Gap also has a higher family-household share (88% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsMccullys Gap vs Kayuga

Common questions

Does Mccullys Gap or Kayuga have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kayuga scores 920 vs 918 in Mccullys Gap. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mccullys Gap
Metric
Kayuga

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$275/wk
74.0%
Owner occupied
29.0%
12.0%
Renter occupied
52.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
262
Population
49
41
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
8
918
Avg ICSEA
920

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).