Side by sideSuburb comparison

Mckees Hill vs Tomki.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mckees Hill edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mckees Hill (956) sits above Tomki (905).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mckees Hill edges out on average school ICSEA (956 vs 905).

Common questionsMckees Hill vs Tomki

Common questions

Does Mckees Hill or Tomki have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mckees Hill scores 956 vs 905 in Tomki. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Mckees Hill
Metric
Tomki

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$310/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$280/wk
$290/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$285/wk
82.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
295
Population
69
44
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
6
956
Avg ICSEA
905

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).